“It’s a company that works with kids, for goodness’ sake,” Spellberg said.
When men do report these incidents, they’re more likely to be brushed off, said San Francisco-based employment attorney Kelly Armstrong.
You can contact the Sex Workers Project by telephone at: 1-646-602-5617We prefer to be contacted by phone wherever possible, because we have found that many questions we receive require an in-depth discussion which is quicker and easier by phone.
Sent from my i Pad Delivered-To: [email protected]: by .226 with SMTP id 95csp1463102lfy; Sun, -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.67.1.102 with SMTP id bf6mr141170041pad.103.1452439030314; Sun, -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from COL004-OMC2S13.(col004-omc2s13.
[.87]) by mx.with ESMTPS id m10si21209465pfi.250.20. for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] .87 as permitted sender) client-ip=.87; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] .87 as permitted sender) [email protected]: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.([.71]) by COL004-OMC2S13.over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, -0800 Received: from CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17(10.1) by CY1PR17MB0062.namprd17(10.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.361.13; Sun, 0000 Received: from CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17(10.1) by CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17(10.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.365.19; Sun, 0000 Received: from CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17([10.1]) by CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17([10.1]) with mapi id .019; Sun, 0000 From: Brent Budowsky To: "[email protected]" Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=webtv.net; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [V 0f DQUzl XFs NZ3qll Bs Kg AXS2e S8DRh] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR17MB0204;23:j2ww/4LE6u CO7E7m DDBtyn PG0Ox TK08y ELQ6kb CHJYTAMb8/Z4A2Gb Nl XB2SGV6y0R6j Imvjw JK5q2s Bz GCJINNc Je Lx KPof xk RWGv Push Se JZhr Dj WVV8qr Fin Zm Gj1ZEyrkv JTU79qowv Ks F1Lo v1EX01T0m99rs Hs Xwhxi N3HMb M7ho/w Fcy Ved Xv OCcr Tlc HGt6YKA8ll U06TBGw==;5:wkrpxh2MPx TA8g U2LCSj Xe NPEe TBZ8OAWg16y ZHv SC2Kz U/2ofc9P59TFJ9Zz L8BROK77iox Oq9OMJYt V2u9te wx Rax9tb9O4DJATGPaj Pttp0Jl C8N29Tz Wf AHz1pw HC5a Nz Syw5Gwp RD31v Wzg A==;24:uc M19egn SUZh Vp Zha Hirbq NA9go NZLg2uj8C85e Itzl8RWb Ig5v Vu KK tlx Hw3ql Od L 5l O gf XM9Rq TIAE8IVf5zn Ll D/NEm FH7INHh2c Y= x-microsoft-antispam: Uri Scan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR: CY1PR17MB0204; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ea2f0e5b-3b79-4e21-f093-08d319d11b29 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR: CY1PR17MB0204; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR: CY1PR17MB0204; x-forefront-prvs: 0817737FD1 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV: NSPM; SFS:(7070004)(98900002); DIR: OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR: CY1PR17MB0204; H: CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17outlook.com; FPR:; SPF: None; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-Cross Tenant-originalarrivaltime: .1621 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-Cross Tenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Cross Tenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Cross Tenant Headers Stamped: CY1PR17MB0204 Return-Path: [email protected]: 1; CY1PR17MB0062;2: Vbus4li HEhf IU6m Fv F9z Bb Nd9Sp px0627DDOZe Jxpzdx DXn H3MV8sv VWFW7/sv TQXVHx Kyh9VZk817Um EFo K7Xc M37v/R INC8Bo Kyl SLTMe Vy BNJY/b SPTNEwf PSIn Uc9p IPvb KUvph0rr9LZk RA==;23:h QFg Xx Br Z2y RIWvj YY9f Xluob Vj DLv57UDRHIV8x3Da9m Mnc H/nv7X9LEFj7f FCM8Gym Y6hw Rkl Pee It55br/QNYMLLwur N r VDgb9Mcg/udek NBhga TXf ZEQc Wf Ho Bxv Fmda NE keb/Ifh Q7F5MFOUt051VP2VC4RN111cby BE= X-Originator Org: sct-15-1-318-15-msonline-outlook-9143d.template Tenant X-Original Arrival Time: .0213 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9C81FD14BB9] I had a multi-email exchange with someone in the media this morning---a nam= e you would know---who is telling me that there are people close to the Cli= ntons who says WJC's sex life could be damaging to her. I also know that for some times there were people purportedly close to the = Clintons pushing the line that the less WJC the better.
I responded that I= totally disagree with that, that WJC's presidency and his personal appeal = are huge assets and that I do not believe people who are the closest to the= Clintons believe what this person in the media is hearing from somebody. Which again I have= always strongly disagreed with and still do.